State-run Criminal Data Repositories are Questioned

rental housing industry trends applyconnect

State-run Criminal Data Repositories are Questioned

SHARE:

With the release of the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics’ 2014 Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems, eye-opening facts on criminal records at state-run record repositories have put their effectiveness into question. In fact, the survey revealed that 20 states have over 3 million unprocessed or partially processed court dispositions, ranging from 200 in Michigan and North Dakota to over 1 million unprocessed in Nevada. Additionally, 8 states report 25% or more of all dispositions received could not be linked to the arrest or charge in the state criminal record database!

As landlords and real estate agents like you depend on the criminal information on the applicant’s background screening report to make effective decisions, this gap of unprocessed and unmatched criminal data at the courts is alarming. If these states’ criminal repositories are failing to timely report criminal offences, who’s to say you might not have rented to an individual you might not have chosen with the knowledge? With 11 states reporting at least a 50 day backlog between when a felony case is decided and when that record is entered into the criminal history database (with 18 states unable to say how long their own backlog is), it’s clear that this issue won’t be resolved any time soon.

There are over 3,200 County Court Clerks in the United States who serve the people as the official keeper of records.  When you go to the ballot box, consider the candidates who will make maximum accuracy a priority.

The release of the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics reveals that choosing a background screening provider all that more important. Your tenant screener should be up-to-date on recent legislation and news to maintain a high industry standard. To combat the holes in many states’ criminal record databases, choose a background screening company that scans your applicant through many databases and has experience catching criminal data discrepancies.

Although many have argued that all recording aspects of background screening for tenant purposes should be handled on a state and federal level, these statistics showcase that many states’ repositories aren’t up to the challenge. Realistically, there will always be some sort of margin of error, but it’s up to you to decide who can reduce that percentage the most and help you make the best decision.

How did you choose your background screener? Let us know in the comments section below and be sure to subscribe!

Subscribe!

Categories

Subscribe for more news and tips!

Share with your friends!

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share via Email

More Articles from ApplyConnect

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe for more news and tips!

Share with your friends!

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share via Email

More Articles from ApplyConnect

Blog Topics

Click the dropdown

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Get Started with ApplyConnect!

The nation’s most trusted tenant screening for real estate agents, landlords, and property managers. No cost background checks available 24/7.

©2018 ApplyConnect. All rights reserved

ApplyConnect marks used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of applyconnect.com. Other product and company names mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.

Get Started with ApplyConnect!

The nation’s most trusted tenant screening for real estate agents, landlords, and property managers. No cost background checks available 24/7.

©2018 ApplyConnect. All rights reserved

ApplyConnect marks used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of applyconnect.com. Other product and company names mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.