Non-Enforcement for Sex Offender Residency Ban in California: The Effects on Rental Property

rental property housing legislation

Non-Enforcement for Sex Offender Residency Ban in California: The Effects on Rental Property

SHARE:

With the March announcement that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) will no longer enforce the blanket residency restrictions for sex offenders as outlined in Proposition 83 (Jessica’s Law), property managers are finding themselves in a gray area concerning whether or not they may deny rental applicants based on their status and if the property is located within 2,000 feet of a park, school or where children congregate.

As property managers throughout California stand by for further guidance regarding whether or not they can consider the sex offender status as a basis in the rental decision, it should be noted that the CDCR’s decision does not impact federal low income housing in California – this includes Section 8 and housing vouchers. At this time, the matter is contained to the state of California.

While the residency ban reversal originates in San Diego County, non-enforcement of the sex offender residency ban is now throughout all 58 California’s counties. Although no formal guidance has been released yet, ApplyConnect will continue to monitor the situation as it unfolds and inform you of developments to remain compliant.

The CDCR’s determination to no longer enforce the residency ban was announced on the heels of the California Supreme Court’s Mar. 2nd unanimous ruling that Jessica’s Law was unconstitutional as it resulted in an uptick of homelessness with sex offenders ineligible for 97 percent of available housing in San Diego County.

Justice Marvin Baxter wrote an opinion for the California Supreme Court and stated, “The residency restrictions place burdens on registered sex offender parolees that are disruptive in a way that hinder their treatment, jeopardizes their health and undercuts their ability to find and maintain employment, significantly undermining any effort at rehabilitation.”

According to a statement issued from CDCR spokesman Luis Patino, California has approximately 6,000 registered sex offenders on parole and of that number, an estimated 1,400 are considered transient with no housing.

Jessica’s Law aimed to safeguard neighborhoods by increasing restrictions and enacting tougher punishments for registered sex offenders. Continuing in her support for the residency ban, State Senator and co-author of Jessica’s Law, Sharon Runner (R-Lancaster) recently wrote an open letter to CDCR Secretary Jeffrey Beard, requesting the immediate release of the opinion from the Attorney General in the decision to loosen the residency restrictions throughout California.

 

By: Laura Mowry

Subscribe for more news and tips!

* indicates required

Share with your friends!

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share via Email

More Articles from ApplyConnect

Tenant Screening

Landlords: The FTC and CFPB Request Public Comment from You!

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) have united to inspect how background screening can impact American renters, with a particular emphasis on examining the use of criminal and housing court records and tenant screening practices. As part of a whole-of-government effort detailed in the White House’s January 2023 Blueprint, the FTC and CFPB are seeking public comment until March 30, 2023. We urge you to voice your unique industry perspective.

Read More »
Tenant Screening

The Ideal Tenant & The Ideal Landlord: A How-To Guide

It’s no secret the relationships between tenants and landlords are sometimes portrayed as less than ideal, even to the point of one party painting the other in a cartoonish, sinister manner. Often, many of the instances that perpetuate ongoing stigmas about both are the result of simple misunderstandings or miscommunication.

Read More »

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share this Article!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More Articles from ApplyConnect

Blog Topics

Click the dropdown

Tenant Screening

Landlords: The FTC and CFPB Request Public Comment from You!

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) have united to inspect how background screening can impact American renters, with a particular emphasis on examining the use of criminal and housing court records and tenant screening practices. As part of a whole-of-government effort detailed in the White House’s January 2023 Blueprint, the FTC and CFPB are seeking public comment until March 30, 2023. We urge you to voice your unique industry perspective.

Read More »
Tenant Screening

The Ideal Tenant & The Ideal Landlord: A How-To Guide

It’s no secret the relationships between tenants and landlords are sometimes portrayed as less than ideal, even to the point of one party painting the other in a cartoonish, sinister manner. Often, many of the instances that perpetuate ongoing stigmas about both are the result of simple misunderstandings or miscommunication.

Read More »

Get Started with ApplyConnect!

The nation’s most trusted tenant screening for real estate agents, landlords, and property managers. No cost background checks available 24/7.

©2018 ApplyConnect. All rights reserved

ApplyConnect marks used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of applyconnect.com. Other product and company names mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.

Get Started with ApplyConnect!

The nation’s most trusted tenant screening for real estate agents, landlords, and property managers. No cost background checks available 24/7.

©2018 ApplyConnect. All rights reserved

ApplyConnect marks used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of applyconnect.com. Other product and company names mentioned herein are the property of their respective owners.